What is OpenCourt?

OpenCourt is an experimental project run by WBUR, Boston’s NPR news station, that uses digital technology to make Quincy District Court more accessible to the public. Anyone with an internet connection will be able to see and hear what goes on in court.

Archive

Note: we post video of court proceedings to our public archive at the end of the second day following the livestream, as described in our current guidelines.

Wednesday May 16, 2012

Presiding: Judge O’Dea.

Wednesday May 9, 2012

Presiding: Judge McCallum.

Tuesday May 8, 2012

Presiding: Judge Coven.

Friday May 4, 2012

Thursday May 3, 2012

Drug Court. Presiding: Judge Moriarty.

Wednesday May 2, 2012

Presiding: Judge Sullivan.

Thursday April 26, 2012

Presiding: Judge Moriarty.

View older archives →

Blog

When is Intent a Criminal Act?

In a scene Friday that echoed a plot line from the film Minority Report, CPCS defense attorney Ethan Yankowicz moved that a charge against his client should be dismissed on grounds the state would essentially be criminalizing a state of mind.

Supreme Judicial Court Rules in Favor of OpenCourt

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court today ruled in favor of OpenCourt’s ability to video record, stream and archive public court proceedings online, writing that restricting rights to publish would violate First Amendment press protections.

Drug Court: A Different Kind Of Second Chance

Arrested for larceny in 2010, Sheehan was offered an alternative to prison time. Called drug court, it’s a strict 18-month rehabilitation program that would require living in a halfway house with a curfew, as well as submitting to regular drug testing and counseling, and appearing weekly before Quincy District Court Judge Diane Moriarty. Story includes extra audio.

OpenCourt Reboots

Quincy District Court was always meant to be a test-bed to discover new ways to cover the court system, and we’re taking steps towards the next phase of expansion.

Debrief: Cooperative Coverage Day

The notes from last month’s experiment are, at the least, a compelling glance at the river of data flowing through our local courts every single day. At best, they offer a new angle on approaching larger questions: how do we get to a place where public court data is more accessible?

Read more blog posts →